Can'tFind The G-Spot? You’re Not Alone: The Science of Sex
As much as I am inspired and impressed by modern medical and scientific advancements—nanotechnology, laparoscopic surgery, and genome sequencing to name a few—I’m also a bit shocked by the fact that we haven’t yet mastered some of the basics. Take human anatomy for instance. Yes, we’ve identified the twenty-six bones of the foot and the ventricles of the brain, but when it comes to deciphering the female urogenital tract, scientists are still at the drawing board. In fact, they have the same questions you might—does the G-spot exist, and if so, where the heck is it? Do women really have a prostate, and if so, can they ejaculate?
The Hotly Debated G-Spot
The G-spot, named after the gynecologist Ernest Gräfenberg, is an alleged erogenous zone located a few centimeters inside the vagina on the anterior wall. Its rise to popularity is usually attributed to the 1982 book, The G Spot and Other Recent Discoveries About Human Sexuality, co-authored by Beverley Whipple, a professor at Rutgers. Though the book describes how to find and stimulate this region, and sent intrepid women to try to locate theirs, it also gave the yet-to-be-classified area an almost mythical status—many have heard of it, and can generally describe what it’s supposed to do, but the majority haven’t actually seen its effects. Currently, there is no recognized part of the female anatomy labeled as the “G-spot.” In fact, researchers debate as to whether it exists at all.
Part of the problem stems from the general lack of research into women’s sexual health, which has hampered the ability to make anatomic generalizations. A review published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology in 2001 states “the evidence is far too weak to support the reality of the G-spot” and that “anecdotal observations and case studies based on a small number of subjects are not supported by anatomic and biochemical studies.”
Skeptics of the G-spot also contend there is no neural pathway to signify a physiologic mechanism. A study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2006 took 101 vagina biopsy samples from twenty-one women and found that although nerves were located regularly throughout the vagina, there is no one location that has more nerve density than others, dispelling the notion of a single erogenous zone inside the vagina.
Recent research, however, indicates variation rather than absence. A study done in 2008 by Emmanuele Jannini and colleagues at the University of L’Aquila in Italy used ultrasound to measure anatomical differences between women who report vaginal orgasms (orgasm due to stimulation of the vaginal walls and not the clitoris) and those who don’t. The researchers scanned the genital area of nine women who reported vaginal orgasms and eleven who didn’t and found that those with orgasms have thicker tissue in the “urethrovaginal space.” The authors conclude that the size of this space is correlated with the ability to have a vaginally-activated orgasm; without evidence of what they call the G-spot, women won’t have this type of orgasm.
However, critics on both sides of the debate question the results of this small study. G-spot detractors contend that this place could just be an extension of the clitoris, which was found in 1998 by Helen O’Connell to be much larger than previously thought—the part we can see externally is really just the tip of the iceberg. Because the clitoris extends all the way into the vagina, perhaps vaginal orgasms occur because they are actually stimulating the part of the clitoris, or the glands, nerves, and tissue surrounding this area.
On the other side of the debate are the G-spot believers who question why the study showed only some women to have G-spots and not all.
Okay, I knew of the GSpot and where the origin developed but can never remember the guys name except that it starts with a G. and he is from a European country.That was satisfactory in all my explainations.But, here is what I recommed. As I said, it works for me.Do not, repeat, DO NOT, tell your female partner what your are doing or she might try to fake it for your pleasure.
After massaging her pussy long enough to get it wet and easy for penetration, take your middle finger, inside (soft side) upward, commence sliding it in slowly, massaging as you go (to expidite the search you can massage her clit with the fingers of the other hand or with your lips and tongue).You can feel a hard (bone) just after entering. I think this is called the clotoris bone.The mention here is only to relate to you just where we are.Now, immdiately beyond that you will find a soft spot (often it gets hard as you continue) that feels kind of like a bubble or a small testicle.That is where you want to place emphasis.While still massaging her clit, massage this spot also and apply pressure as you do.I have always learned that my partner commences to squirm and moan loudly. Keep it up until her body becomes limber and relaxed. Normally the body will become stiff and regid prior to surrender.I believe you have found that GSpot.
I have tried this method on many and often get the response afterwrd, "What did you do? I have never had a climax like that."
Which, to me, goes to prove that an 8 inch dick might be something to boast about but a 4 incher will do the thing in this case and the partners climax is what we are interested in.I have also had many ladies tell me, "4 inches is plenty for me."
As the old saying goes, most ladies say, "I'd rather be tickled to death than choked to death."
I don't know how I overlooked this.It came to my attention after someone commented on:The Results Ar In:
I tried that on my wife lasty night and let me profess that it works.She actually went wild.Thanks.